According to the jus ad bellum tradition established
by Augustine and Aquinas, the third requirement for a just war is “rightful
intention”, which is either “the advancement of good, or the avoidance of
evil”. Olen et al (2005, p. 305) ask, “How should we determine what a rightful
intention is? By whose standards should we judge the advancement of ‘good’?”
For a just war these things
should be considered
·
The war must be for a just cause.
·
The war must be lawfully declared by a lawful
authority.
·
The intention behind the war must be good.
·
All other ways of resolving the problem should have
been tried first.
·
There must be a reasonable chance of success.
·
The means used must be in proportion to the end
that the war seeks to achieve.
One of the criteria for a just
war is the intention behind the war must be good or ‘rightful’ To determine rightful intention
these things must be in place
·
Creating, restoring or keeping a just peace
·
Righting a wrong
·
Assisting the innocent.
These can be seen as rightful intention,
which according to St. Aquinas (Aquinas
was a 13th century priest and friar) is the advancement of good or
the avoidance of evil.
It is also the responsibility of the governments and the
people to ensure rightful intention is maintained.
Standards used to judge the advancement of good should be
those used by all of mankind
In the current international system it is the
responsibility of the United Nations (UN), and in particular the UN Security
Council, to assess the causes of war and decide whether or not a particular war
is legitimate or justified. In addition, individual states retain the sovereign
right to self-defence: ‘Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the
inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack
occurs against a Member of the United Nations’.
Charter of the United Nations, Chapter 1, Article 51, located
at http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/ 27/05/15
The UN Security Council was formed before the cold war, now
it is evident that each country is more independent of each other and the
differences in which each country might think is just or unjust s probably
evident over the last 30 years with various civil wars, Afganhastan, Iraq and
now the war on terrorism. In the end it is up to humanity to judge the
advancement of good and avoid evil, the outcome of how well humanity will do
will be no doubt judged by future generations.
346 words without
references
318 without quote
Hi, Nice site thanks for sharing. Would it be okay to contact you through your email? Please email me back.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
Randy
randydavis387 gmail.com
Hi!
ReplyDeleteThanks I don't get to spend as much time on this blog as I would like !!!
Please click on the follow me link !
Email me on Rochelle.veronica@gmail.com
Cheers